Forgot password? | Register here

Editor's Picks

Primetime Politics at The Heritage Foundation

More Videos
Current Featured Debate

Closer Than He Should Be

Robert Novak | Primetime Politics

McCain Takes Aim at Obama’s Character

Ben Smith and Jonathan Martin | Politico

Audacity Overload

Kathryn Jean Lopez | National Review

Current Featured Debate

Political Cycles

Peggy Noonan | Wall Street Journal

Report From a Forgotten War

Oliver North | Human Events

No Will To Drill

Charles Krauthammer | The Washington Post

There Won’t Be ‘Peace’ Without Democracy

Natan Sharansky and Bassem Eid | The Wall Street Journal

How a Local Squall Might Become a Global Tempest

Niall Ferguson | Financial Times

McCain’s Last Frontier

Jonah Goldberg | National Review

Don’t Laugh. Paris Is Right.

Howard Fineman | Newsweek

Fight or Die Republicans

Michael Reagan | Human Events

The World Watches

Editorial | Investor's Business Daily



Article

Too Late to the Duck Hunt

Charles Krauthammer | Primetime Politics

By the time Hillary Clinton figured out how to beat Barack Obama, it was too late. When she began the race in 2007 thinking she was in for a coronation, she claimed the center in order to position herself for the real fight, the general election. She simply assumed the party activists and loony left would fall in behind her.

However, as Obama began to rise, powered by the party’s Net-roots activists, she scurried left, particularly with her progressively more explicit renunciation of the Iraq war. It was a fool’s errand. She would never be able to erase the stain of her original war vote and she remained unwilling to do an abject John Edwards self-flagellating recantation. It took her weeks even to approximate the apology the left was looking for, and by then it was far too late. The party’s activist wing was by then unbreakably betrothed to Obama.

But going left proved disastrous for Clinton. It abolished all significant policy differences between her and Obama, the National Journal’s 2007 most liberal senator. On health care, for example, her attempts to turn a minor difference in the definition of universality into a major assault on Obama fell flat. With no important policy differences separating them, the contest became one of character and personality. Matched against this elegant, intellectually nimble, hugely talented newcomer, she had no chance of winning that contest.

She tried everything. Her charges that he was a man of nothing but words came off as a petulant, envious attack on eloquence. The power to inspire may not be sufficient to qualify for the presidency, but it is hardly a liability.

She tried a silly plagiarism charge, then settled for the experience card. In a change election, this was not a brilliant strategy. It forced her to dwell on the 1990s, playing candidate of the past to Obama’s candidate of the future. Her studied attempts to embellish her experience led her into a thicket of confabulated Bosnian sniper fire.

It wasn’t until late in the fourth quarter that she found the seam in Obama’s defense. In fact, Obama handed her the playbook with Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Michelle Obama’s comments about never having been proud of America and Obama’s own guns-and-God condescension toward small-town whites.

The line of attack is clear: not that Obama is himself radical or unpatriotic, just that, as a man of the academic left, he is so out of touch with everyday America that he could move so easily and untroubled in such extreme company and among such alien and elitist sentiments.

Clinton finally understood the way to run against Obama: back to the center—not ideologically but culturally, not on policy but on attitude. She changed none of her positions on Iraq or Iran or health care or taxes. Instead, she transformed herself into working-class Sally-get-her-gun, off duck hunting with dad.

The gas tax holiday was never an economic or policy issue. It was meant to position her culturally. It heightened her identification with her white working-class constituency. Obama played his part by citing economists in opposing it. That completed her narrative: He had the pointy-headed professors on his side; she had the single moms seeking relief at the pump.

It was an overreach. It not only deflected attention away from the amazing Rev. Wright at the height of his spectacular return. It also never played as the elitist-vs.-working-folk issue she had wanted, because it isn’t just economists who know the gas tax holiday is nothing but a cheap gimmick. Ordinary folks do, too. And the gas tax idea had the unfortunate side effect of reinforcing Hillary’s main character liability vis-a-vis Obama: cynical Washington pol willing to do or say anything to win votes vs. the idealistic straight shooter refusing to pander even if it costs him.

The lightness in Hillary’s step in the days before Indiana and North Carolina reflected the relief of the veteran politician who, after months of treading water, finally finds the right campaign strategy. But it was far too late. And the gas tax overkill, one final error of modulation, sealed the deal—for Obama.

There’s only one remaining chapter in this fascinating spectacle. Negotiating the terms of Hillary’s surrender. After which we will have six months of watching her enthusiastically stumping the country for Obama, denying with utter conviction Republican charges that he is the out of touch, latte-sipping elitist she warned Democrats against so urgently in the last, late leg of her doomed campaign.

(c) 2008 Washington Post Writers Group

Comment Email this Article Post an Article

Comments

Great article, but I disagree with the concluding remarks that what comes next is Hillary stumping for Obama.  I believe that what comes next is Hillary fighting hard, very hard, for months, for the Vice-Presidency.  She has nothing else in her life but lust for power.  Nothing.  And now the Vice-Presidency is in front of her face, like meat in front of a dog who hasn’t eaten for a week.  I pray Obama doesn’t make the mistake of his life and give in to her.

Posted by Audrey  on  05/09  at  07:48 AM

The “inevitable one” had no message and like her grifter husband she is no less of a con artist as he was. This was the opening for Obama, ("The one we have been waiting for, the Expected One") his crew knew that she was an empty suit, arrogant, shallow and utterly corrupt with a very bad strategy to win. No issue mattered, only the misguided opinion of her bad team and what was bounced off the media. They set up various 527, raised huge fortune from dubious characters and foreigners (like they did in the past-China, Indonesia, Gulf countries) and some turned around and stabbed her (MoveOn, Kos, Huffington). These two candidates are working hard to reCarterize the U.S and turn it into a Bananera for the second time in 30 years.

Posted by KotOti  on  05/09  at  08:11 AM

Name:

Email:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Comment Policy

Please keep comments on topic and civil. Comments deemed by the editors to be rude, obnoxious, mean-spirited, or off topic may be removed without notice