Forgot password? | Register here

Editor's Picks

Daniel Hannon

More Videos
Current Featured Debate

Closer Than He Should Be

Robert Novak | Primetime Politics

McCain Takes Aim at Obama’s Character

Ben Smith and Jonathan Martin | Politico

Audacity Overload

Kathryn Jean Lopez | National Review

Current Featured Debate

Solar Flag Lights for Memorial Day

YCA Solar Light Store | www.YCASolarLightStore.com

Maine Troop Greeters

Great Americans | Maine Troop Greeters.com

Is Anti-Zionism Hate?

Judea Pearl | Los Angeles Times

Chas Freeman: His Wit and Wisdom

Scott Johnson | Powerlineblog

Is Rand Relevant?

Yaron Brook | Wall Street Journal

A General Warning

Editorial | Investor's Business Daily

Obama’s ‘Science’ Fiction

Charles Krauthammer | The Washington Post

The Brokest Generation

Mark Steyn | National Review



Article

The Audacity of Rhetoric

Thomas Sowell | Primetime Politics

It is painful to watch defenders of Barack Obama tying themselves into knots trying to evade the obvious.

Some are saying that Senator Obama cannot be held responsible for what his pastor, Jeremiah Wright, said. In their version of events, Barack Obama just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time—and a bunch of mean-spirited people are trying to make something out of it.

It makes a good story, but it won’t stand up under scrutiny.

Barack Obama’s own account of his life shows that he consciously sought out people on the far left fringe. In college, “I chose my friends carefully,” he said in his first book, “Dreams From My Father.”

These friends included “Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk rock performance poets”—in Obama’s own words—as well as the “more politically active black students.” He later visited a former member of the terrorist Weatherman underground, who endorsed him when he ran for state senator.

Obama didn’t just happen to encounter Jeremiah Wright, who just happened to say some way out things. Jeremiah Wright is in the same mold as the kinds of people Barack Obama began seeking out in college—members of the left, anti-American counter-culture.

In Shelby Steele’s brilliantly insightful book about Barack Obama—“A Bound Man”—it is painfully clear that Obama was one of those people seeking a racial identity that he had never really experienced in growing up in a white world. He was trying to become a convert to blackness, as it were—and, like many converts, he went overboard.

Nor has Obama changed in recent years. His voting record in the U.S. Senate is the furthest left of any Senator. There is a remarkable consistency in what Barack Obama has done over the years, despite inconsistencies in what he says.

The irony is that Obama’s sudden rise politically to the level of being the leading contender for his party’s presidential nomination has required him to project an entirely different persona, that of a post-racial leader who can heal divisiveness and bring us all together.

The ease with which he has accomplished this chameleon-like change, and entranced both white and black Democrats, is a tribute to the man’s talent and a warning about his reliability.

There is no evidence that Obama ever sought to educate himself on the views of people on the other end of the political spectrum, much less reach out to them. He reached out from the left to the far left. That’s bringing us all together?

Is “divisiveness” defined as disagreeing with the agenda of the left? Who on the left was ever called divisive by Obama before that became politically necessary in order to respond to revelations about Jeremiah Wright?

One sign of Obama’s verbal virtuosity was his equating a passing comment by his grandmother—“a typical white person,” he says—with an organized campaign of public vilification of America in general and white America in particular, by Jeremiah Wright.

Since all things are the same, except for the differences, and different except for the similarities, it is always possible to make things look similar verbally, however different they are in the real world.

Among the many desperate gambits by defenders of Senator Obama and Jeremiah Wright is to say that Wright’s words have a “resonance” in the black community.

There was a time when the Ku Klux Klan’s words had a resonance among whites, not only in the South but in other states. Some people joined the KKK in order to advance their political careers. Did that make it OK? Is it all just a matter of whose ox is gored?

While many whites may be annoyed by Jeremiah Wright’s words, a year from now most of them will probably have forgotten about him. But many blacks who absorb his toxic message can still be paying for it, big-time, for decades to come.

Why should young blacks be expected to work to meet educational standards, or even behavioral standards, if they believe the message that all their problems are caused by whites, that the deck is stacked against them? That is ultimately a message of hopelessness, however much audacity it may have.

(c) 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc.

Comment Email this Article Post an Article

Comments

Why couldn’t all this happen a few weeks from now, when he’s the certain nominee?  Now Hillary has a legitimate argument to make to superdelegates that the big O is unelectable.

Posted by rookie  on  03/24  at  08:03 PM

Your essay is nonsense.  To quote you:

“There is no evidence that Obama ever sought to educate himself on the views of people on the other end of the political spectrum, much less reach out to them.”

So what do you suppose Obama meant when he said:
“...I think Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not. He put us on a fundamentally different path because the country was ready for it. I think they felt like with all the excesses of the 1960s and 1970s and government had grown and grown but there wasn’t much sense of accountability in terms of how it was operating. I think people, he just tapped into what people were already feeling, which was we want clarity we want optimism, we want a return to that sense of dynamism and entrepreneurship that had been missing.”

More of you: “Who on the left was ever called divisive by Obama before that became politically necessary in order to respond to revelations about Jeremiah Wright?”

Geraldine Ferraro, for one.

Tom, if you’re going to be a writer, do your homework.

Posted by Louie  on  03/24  at  09:16 PM

Mr. Louie, you are not half the man Mr. Sowell is, and it could be more polite to be a bit more respectful when discussing an eminent scholar as Mr. Sowell. The bottom line about this poseur candidate is that in the process of finding his true calling, he courted the wisdom of hard core leftists, Communists, subversives and individuals who in general wanted power more than the goals they have been advocating:Helping the “workers” and the poor. A Community organizer, is nothing more than another word for a Communist who is trying to set a secret, undercover cell - a base - from which power can be obtained in a later date to gain control over others. Obama is just another clown: A Liberal Facist of a sort.  One who thinks he knows it all and his wisdom will take us to an unknown territory. Sadly, he was influenced by the same character who tutored and inpsired Mme. Clinton, a Chicago based Communist named Saul Alinsky-in whose grave- he finally got two for one!

Posted by KotOti  on  03/24  at  10:33 PM

And now I’ll take the gloves off;

Barrack aligned himself with, became good friends with and chose as his spiritual advisor a Black Pantheresque radical racist.  Then Obama spun it into a condescending lecture to all the Aunt Whiteys out there to feel guilty and vote for (or at least not attack) him.  If McCain had David Duke or Jerry Falwell as his spiritual advisor, he’d be attacked so savagely there wouldn‘t be anything left of his carcass.  But when Obama spins his involvement in a racist, radical church into a reason why he is post-racial candidate, it’s indeed a daring political dodge, spin, turn, parry and thrust.  But he’s accidentally attacked himself by showing that he is indeed NOT the leader to help heal America‘s racial wounds.

If Obama were the next Martin Luther, the next unity leader, the next great racial healer, wouldn’t he be able to make some impact on a very racist, radical church over the course of twenty years? 

Or is Obama really just a political opportunist who will pander to the worst parts of the American soul to get elected, institute socialism and weaken our hand with Islamofascists? 

Signed,
Your Typical White Person

Posted by Downriver D  on  03/25  at  12:35 AM

Bravo!

Posted by KotOti  on  03/25  at  06:17 AM

Mr. Sowell, this is a poor piece of writing.  Louie is right.  Obama has said some very positive things about President Reagan, rest his soul.  How can you possibly say Obama hasn’t reached across the aisle?

What’s more, the video montage on FOX is ages old, is about two minutes of hundreds of sermons, and Obama wasn’t even in attendance for the anti-American rants.  Obama is running for President, not the Reverend.

Please visit http://www.republicansforobama.org.  And let’s base our opinions on real facts.

Posted by Frank Malone  on  03/25  at  03:06 PM

The slime keeps piling up!
This is not guilt by association. It is not
the “audacity to make a judgement” ot the
mindless slogans like “the firece urgency of now”
here we see how a man who wants to become POTUS spends his best years with racists, bigots and militant lunatics. I am not sure the remaining folks that need to select a candidate and those who will vote in November will want a person with such poor judgement to be thier president.

Posted by KotOti  on  03/27  at  11:10 AM

Name:

Email:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Comment Policy

Please keep comments on topic and civil. Comments deemed by the editors to be rude, obnoxious, mean-spirited, or off topic may be removed without notice