The Rules Are Changing for Obama
Barack Obama seemed puzzled. Angrily puzzled. The apostle of hope seemed flummoxed by the audacity of the question.
Barack Obama seemed puzzled. Angrily puzzled. The apostle of hope seemed flummoxed by the audacity of the question.
Fallout from the ABC debate in Philadelphia reveals that many journalists are more than just observers in the Obama phenomenon.
As Wednesday’s awful debate proves, it won’t matter who the presidential nominee is—the press will play footsie with McCain and attack the Democrat.
Why does Barack Obama refuse to discuss his “friendly” relationship with Bill Ayers?
The media favorite has a very poor grasp of basic economic principles.
The irony of Barack Obama’s “bitter” comments is that he was lamenting the failure of white working-class people to vote their “class interests” before an audience of affluent San Francisco Democrats doing exactly the same thing.
The content of a person’s character is especially important when they’re seeking to be president of ALL Americans.
Obama is guilty of poor judgement in choosing and sticking with his ‘friends’, but his missteps are not gaffes - not the mispronounciation or misapplication of a word or two; his statements reflect his true character.
The problem for the Democrats is the Obama-lovers are all done listening to criticism of their beloved saint. Any new revelation is dismissed, regardless of its merits.
The only time these Obama revelations come into play is in the general, when Republicans and Independents can be swayed to keep the freshman Senator away from the reigns of power. Sounds like a good scenario to me.
Comment Policy
Please keep comments on topic and civil. Comments deemed by the editors to be rude, obnoxious, mean-spirited, or off topic may be removed without notice