Comment Policy
Please keep comments on topic and civil. Comments deemed by the editors to be rude, obnoxious, mean-spirited, or off topic may be removed without notice
Attorney General Michael Mukasey collapsed while giving a speech to the Federalist Society tonight. It appears to have been a stroke. Prayers.
0 Comments
Some incredible photos from the newly-central front in the War on Terror.
0 Comments
What we’ve seen in the smears against Sarah Palin go beyond the normal post-election squabbling.
0 Comments
Thank you to our heroes. It’s you who make this grand experiment called America possible.
0 Comments
All is not lost. An Obama presidency does provide an opportunity for Conservatives.
0 Comments
“What an old anecdote about Mo Udall in the hospital reveals about McCain’s character.” A must-read.
0 Comments
More video evidence that “hope” and “change” really mean “typical politician.” The man has flip flopped more than John Kerry did in 2004.
0 Comments
You have to admit that Saturday Night Live has done a spectacular job at becoming relevant again during the campaign. (Olbermann-bashing bonus)
1 Comments
There’s an interesting opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal today, entitled ”No, Iraq Wasn’t a ‘Distraction.”
I think two great points made in the article are here:
As Mrs. Palin pointed out, when it comes to foreign policy, the Obama-Biden team is backward looking. It continues to view international issues through the prism of opposition to George W. Bush. Nowhere is this more apparent than in Obama-Biden’s continuing assertions that the Iraq war was a mistake, from beginning to the end, and that, at best, it constituted an irrelevant distraction from the combat that really matters—in Afghanistan.
Osama bin Laden himself called Iraq the “central front” in his fight against the United States. Thousands of jihadists operated in Iraq where, with the help of Sen. John McCain’s and Gen. David Petraeus’s surge strategy, al Qaeda was resoundingly defeated. Its standing in the Muslim world has plummeted.
As in many other conflicts in American history, our enemies in this war operate in many geographically distinct theaters. The essence of being a good commander in chief is appreciating the connections among these theaters—including the adversary’s willingness to open new fronts—rather than obsessing about where the last enemy attack originated.
and here:
The next president will likely be similarly tested by Russia and by Iran. Iranian leaders are stubbornly pursuing a policy of acquiring nuclear weapons, despite years of dialogue with Western interlocutors. The chances that they would take any more seriously diplomatic advances from a new and untried President Barack Obama are remote. Most likely, they would interpret it as a sign of weakness, causing them to accelerate their nuclear program.
The best way to create a strong negotiating position vis-à-vis Tehran, would be to alter the strategic environment in its backyard, such that the Iraqi government has stabilized that country and maintains strong military and intelligence ties with the United States, while dramatically curtailing Iranian influence. This, of course, is precisely what Mr. McCain’s Iraq strategy is in the process of accomplishing, and what Mr. Obama’s Iraq policy can never achieve. It would be the McCain-Palin team that is best positioned to engage in fruitful diplomatic dialogue with the Iranians.
That about sums it up, but if you’ve got time, you can read the whole thing here.
Comment Policy
Please keep comments on topic and civil. Comments deemed by the editors to be rude, obnoxious, mean-spirited, or off topic may be removed without notice